All readers have pet peeves about storytelling. There are some things that just irritate you when you see them in a story or a movie. I think writers are even more prone to these kinds of tics than other readers, partly because we’re used to watching out for what does and doesn’t work in our own stories.
One of my own personal annoyances is with books that start out with a main character having amnesia. Why does it bug me? Well, partly because it strikes me as lazy writing, most of the time – like the character who always asks obvious questions for the sake of exposition via dialogue (*cough* Tasha Yar *cough* Next Generation Star Trek *cough*). I don’t mind if the character develops amnesia later in the story, but to start out with it just seems like such a cheap way to get away with a long setup for your world and your characters, with an oh-so-obvious element of mystery. The trouble is, it leaves me cold, and here’s the main reason:
99% of the amnesia beginnings I’ve read treat “amnesia” like it means “lack of personality”. I’m sure that, without our memories, we’d all act somewhat different than usual, but we wouldn’t lose our personalities altogether. You’d still think like yourself, you just wouldn’t know why you thought the way you did. Aside from the fact that it makes no sense to equate loss of memory with loss of personality, there’s nothing duller, to me, than a book without good characters. I latch onto characters quicker than any other story element, and so do many, many other readers. Give me a lousy anchor, and I’m getting on a different boat, thanks all the same.
One thing I love, though, is finding stories that break my personal rules of reading and writing. I’m delighted when a writer can do something I detest, and make me fall in love with his/her book anyway. For one thing, it impresses me, and for another thing, I like to figure out why their book was different. Why did this work, when dozens of other books didn’t (or at least, didn’t work for me)?
For my Amnesia Openings pet peeve, the book that shatters the rule is Nine Princes in Amber, the first book in Roger Zelazny’s Chronicles of Amber series. Why does Zelazny get a free pass when the very first page of his series starts with the main character having no memory? Because, also on the first page, he shows me his narrator has a great deal of personality. Within half a page, the reader knows he’s suspicious, calculating, tricky, and funny. The narrative voice, the questions and doubts that cross his mind, the decisions he makes, and the way he handles his lack of knowledge about himself or what happened to him, work together beautifully to establish what type of person he is and how he thinks, and to simultaneously set up the first inklings of conflict and danger. There’s nothing lazy about writing that can do all that with half a page.
The best writing makes the most of each and every scene – not just because it makes the book richer, although it does, but also because that’s the kind of writing that grabs people. It’s exciting to open a book and be in another place, but more exciting to open a book and be in another place with interesting questions to be answered, mysterious events on the horizon, and a fascinating main character to anchor you in the world of the story. A narrative hook, by itself, isn’t enough. You need some bait, too – if I may mix my nautical metaphors here in my blog (I would avoid doing so at all costs in a story!) 😉